Skip to the case study
All case studies
Contents
The results
The subject: Intel
The investor's dilemma
The algorithm
“The long sideways market”
“The run up”
“The round trip”
Side by side
Why the results differ
The real lesson
A path forward
Book a demo
Case studies
INTC
Case study: Arch Public for stocks
INTC: the stock that tested every kind of patience
The Market Wave Algorithm for Equities against Intel in three windows. Dollar cost averaging beaten in all three.
Intel: the chipmaker that spent eight years losing its lead, lost its dividend, took on the US government as a shareholder, and then tripled in a spring.
INTC
Stock
Market Wave Algorithm for Equities
Valued August 21, 2026
10 min read
Why this case study, and why now
We have already shown what disciplined, rules-based execution does with a runaway winner, a brutal drawdown, a sideways index, and a stock that kept changing its story. Intel is a different problem. Intel made investors wait. It went sideways for years, round tripped for two more, and only paid the people who were still there when the run finally came.
That history leaves today's investor with three questions, and this study answers each one with its own window and its own recipe of the Market Wave Algorithm for Equities.
What happens in a market that goes nowhere for years?
The long sideways window runs the algorithm through four years of Intel doing nothing, on the weekly chart. June 1, 2018 to April 1, 2022.
Strategy
+95.9%
Buy and hold
-15.7%
DCA
-8.2%
What did this year actually pay?
The run up window is the 2026 scoreboard, on the daily chart. January 1, 2026 to August 21, 2026.
Strategy
+117.9%
DCA
+44.9%
What if the market cools off again?
The round trip runs the algorithm through Intel's last collapse and recovery, on the hourly chart. January 1, 2024 to April 1, 2026.
Strategy
+159.1%
Buy and hold
-0.6%
DCA
+72.3%
Every run starts from the same hypothetical $100,000 in cash and zero shares.
Backtested results. Past performance does not guarantee future results. For educational purposes only.
Intel, INTC
The subject
Intel designs and manufactures the processors inside most of the world's PCs and a large share of its servers, and it is the only American company still building leading edge chips on American soil. For most of the last decade that second fact was a liability. In 2026 it became the whole story.
The price history reads like three different stocks.
June 2018 Intel trades near $57, close to a then eighteen year high. Within weeks its CEO resigns and its 10 nanometer delays become public.
July 2020 Intel announces its 7 nanometer process is a year behind. The stock falls 16% in a day and never recovers the level.
April 2021 A new CEO, Pat Gelsinger, and a $20 billion Arizona fab plan lift the stock to a high near $68. It is the last high for five years.
April 2022 Intel trades near $48, below where it stood in June 2018. Four years, nothing to show for it.
August 2, 2024 Intel suspends its dividend, cuts 15,000 jobs, and falls 26% in a day, its worst session since 1974. By April 2025 the stock trades near $18.
2025 SoftBank invests $2 billion, the US government takes a 10% stake, and Nvidia buys $5 billion of stock at $23.28. The stock finishes the year near $37, up 84%, and still below where it started 2024.
2026 A supply shortfall knocks 17% off the stock on January 23. Then, from late March, the foundry turnaround lands: a reported Apple manufacturing deal, first quarter revenue $1.4 billion above guidance, and a record high of $142.35 in late June. A 30% slide through July follows. Intel trades near $90 today.
Here is the catch that matters for this study. Intel paid enormously, eventually. But the people it paid were the ones who sat through four flat years, a 26% day, a trip to $18, and a 17% day in January, without selling. Almost nobody did.
The investor's dilemma
Intel is a patience test, and patience is not a strategy. The stock sets up three failure modes that human investors handle badly.
The sideways grind
From 2018 to 2022, Intel went nowhere while the rest of the market doubled. Holders either gave up and sold into the 2020 low, or held a dead position for four years out of loyalty to a name. Neither choice produced a dollar.
The round trip ride
A buy and hold investor from January 2024 watched the stock lose 60% in a year, bottom near $18, and claw back to even by April 2026. Twenty seven months of holding, most of it deeply underwater, for a return of negative 0.6%. The account survived. The investor's conviction usually does not, and the ones who sold at $18 never got to see April.
The too high freeze
Intel doubled in April 2026 and doubled again by June. Every entry point looked like the top. Investors who waited for a comfortable price watched a $39 stock become a $142 stock, then finally bought in late June, a few sessions before a 30% slide.
Dollar cost averaging deserves honest credit here. It kept buying near $18 in 2025 when nobody else would, and it earned +72.3% through the round trip for it. But DCA has a structural cost: it buys blind, it never sells, and it never realizes a dollar of profit. Through four sideways years it lost money. In the 2026 run it bought all the way up and banked nothing at the top.
A rules-based algorithm restores what Intel takes away: a way to get paid while you wait.
Market Wave Algorithm for Equities
The algorithm
Market Wave is the Arch Public algorithm for equities. It does three things, and it does them without asking how you feel about the news.
Ride confirmed moves
It enters when price action confirms a move, not when a headline promises one, and it keeps adding within its rules while the move holds.
Exit on rules, not nerves
It takes profit into strength at levels set in advance. Gains become cash because the system says so, not because the holder finally flinched.
Step aside in chop
When the wave flattens, it stops trading. No revenge trades, no averaging into a falling knife.
The same algorithm also adjusts to the question you ask it. Scope runs from 0.5, reading the market hour by hour, to 20, reading it in quarters. This study uses three recipes for three jobs: a 2.5 scope on weekly bars to harvest four sideways years, a 2 scope on daily bars with a downtrend exit to ride this year's run and step off when it broke, and a 2.5 scope on hourly bars with a wide exit threshold to work a two year round trip into cash. Same discipline, three different jobs.
The long sideways market, weekly chart
Scope 2.5
0.5 micro 20 macro
A 2.5 scope on weekly bars to harvest four sideways years.
The run up, daily chart
Scope 2
0.5 micro 20 macro
A 2 scope on daily bars with a downtrend exit to ride this year's run and step off when it broke.
The round trip, hourly chart
Scope 2.5
0.5 micro 20 macro
A 2.5 scope on hourly bars with a wide exit threshold to work a two year round trip into cash.
Backtested results. Past performance does not guarantee future results. For educational purposes only.
Scenario one
“The long sideways market”
June 1, 2018 to April 1, 2022 · Weekly chart · Scope 2.5
This window answers the question every long term holder dreads: what if the stock just sits there? Intel entered the window near $57, a level it would not see again for years. It sold off on the CEO resignation and the 10 nanometer delays, recovered into 2020, crashed 16% in a day on the 7 nanometer news, rallied to $68 on the Gelsinger plan in April 2021, and slid back to $48 by April 2022. Buy and hold finished at negative 15.7%. Dollar cost averaging, buying monthly for 46 months, finished at negative 8.2%. Four years of patience, and both benchmarks lost money.
The algorithm treated the range as a market. It bought the dips inside its rules, sold the rips, and built a position on the way.
Strategy return
+95.9%
Buy and hold -15.7%, outperformance +111.6 percentage points
DCA -8.2%, outperformance +104 percentage points
Ending value
$195,855
Realized profit, banked in cash
$100,289
Unrealized loss on the open position at window end
-$4,434
Shares held
4,056 at $49.20 avg cost
Cash
$721
Open full-size chart
The number to read Read the basis. Four years of buying weakness by rule left this account holding 4,056 Intel shares at $49.20 each, with the entire starting capital already returned as realized cash. Intel trades near $90 today, which makes that same position worth $366,338 as of this writing. That is what a sideways market is worth to a rules-based account: the years everyone else wrote off became the accumulation phase, and the run that came later paid it in full.
Backtested results. Weekly chart, window valued April 1, 2022. Position value today from public market data. Past performance does not guarantee future results. For educational purposes only.
Scenario two
“The run up”
January 1, 2026 to August 21, 2026 · Daily chart · Scope 2 with the downtrend exit
This is the 2026 scoreboard, the window everyone will remember. Intel opened the year near $39, lost 17% in a day on January 23, then ran from roughly $45 at the end of March to a $142.35 record in late June, more than tripling in a quarter. July took 30% of it back. Dollar cost averaging, buying monthly across the window, earned +44.9%, a strong year by any normal standard, with its later buys landing near the top.
The algorithm did not predict the run. It rode what the market confirmed, sold into strength by rule, and when the trend broke in July it sold on the break and started buying the decline in small steps.
Strategy return
+117.9%
DCA +44.9%, outperformance +73.1 percentage points
Ending value
$217,928
Realized profit, banked in cash
$118,627
Unrealized loss on the open position
-$699
Shares held
2,404 at $90.67 avg cost
Cash
$654
Open full-size chart
The number to read Read the realized number. $118,627 in banked profit is the whole year's gain converted to cash before the July slide could take it back. The DCA investor is up +44.9% on paper and owns a position bought at an average price well above today's. The algorithm owns 2,404 shares bought back near today's price, with its profit already in dollars.
Backtested results. Daily chart, valued August 21, 2026. Past performance does not guarantee future results. For educational purposes only.
Scenario three
“The round trip”
January 1, 2024 to April 1, 2026 · Hourly chart · Scope 2.5 with a wide 9.4% exit threshold
Every investor in this year's winners carries the same quiet fear: what if the market cools off and the stock gives it all back? You do not have to imagine it. Intel already ran that experiment. This window contains the August 2024 dividend suspension and 26% day, the December 2024 CEO exit, the April 2025 low near $18, the SoftBank, government, and Nvidia lifelines, an 84% year in 2025, and the 17% drop in January 2026. A buy and holder who entered near $50 spent two years underwater and finished at negative 0.6%. Twenty seven months for nothing. Dollar cost averaging earned +72.3%, its blind monthly buys through the 2025 low doing exactly what DCA does well.
The algorithm beat them both, and it banked cash on the way down and back.
Strategy return
+159.1%
Buy and hold -0.6%, outperformance +159.7 percentage points
DCA +72.3%, outperformance +86.8 percentage points
Ending value
$259,059
Realized profit, banked in cash
$108,169
Unrealized profit on open shares
$50,890
Shares held
4,222 at $35.96 avg cost
Cash
$56,360
Open full-size chart
The number to read Read the basis. The algorithm bought the collapse in 25.8% steps, and the wide 9.4% exit threshold let it hold most of what it bought through the 2025 recovery. The result is 4,222 Intel shares at $35.96 each, bought near the bottom of a round trip that returned a buy and holder to zero. Intel trades near $90 today, which makes that same position worth $383,147 as of this writing. That is what a cool off is worth to a rules-based account: the collapse everyone feared became the accumulation phase, and the run that started one week after this window closed paid it in full. If the next cool off looks anything like the last one, this window is the plan for it.
Backtested results. Hourly chart, window valued April 1, 2026. Past performance does not guarantee future results. For educational purposes only.
Side by side
INTC results by scenario
The long sideways market
The run up
The round trip
Window
Jun 1, 2018 to Apr 1, 2022
Jan 1 to Aug 21, 2026
Jan 1, 2024 to Apr 1, 2026
Chart and scope
Weekly, 2.5
Daily, 2
Hourly, 2.5
Strategy return
+95.9%
+117.9%
+159.1%
DCA return
-8.2%
+44.9%
+72.3%
Edge vs DCA
+104 pts
+73.1 pts
+86.8 pts
Ending value
$195,855
$217,928
$259,059
Realized profit
$100,289
$118,627
$108,169
Shares held at end
4,056
2,404
4,222
Average cost basis
$49.20
$90.67
$35.96
Cash at end
$721
$654
$56,360
All figures from a hypothetical $100,000 starting in cash. Each window valued at its own end date.
Look at the realized profit row first. In three different markets, a four year range, a one year run, and a two year round trip, the algorithm converted movement into banked cash, and in every window the realized profit alone exceeded the starting account. Then look at the basis row. The two windows where Intel went nowhere left the account holding thousands of shares at $49.20 and $35.96, bought by rule while everyone else was waiting. The benchmarks needed Intel to go up. The algorithm needed Intel to move.
Backtested results. Past performance does not guarantee future results. For educational purposes only.
Why the results differ
The three scenarios are not three strategies. They are one algorithm answering the three questions investors actually ask.
Ask it what happens when a stock goes nowhere for years
Answer: the weekly recipe answers: +95.9% harvested from a range that lost money for both benchmarks, plus 4,056 shares at a $49.20 basis handed to the next bull market.
Ask it what this year was worth
Answer: the daily recipe answers: +117.9%, with the whole gain realized before July took 30% off the stock.
Ask it what happens if the market cools off again
Answer: the hourly recipe answers: +159.1% through a round trip that returned a buy and holder to zero, plus 4,222 shares at a $35.96 basis bought near the bottom of it.
The benchmarks could not adapt because they only ever make one decision. Buy and hold decides once and waits. DCA decides once and repeats. Both were at the mercy of which chapter of the Intel story their one decision happened to land in, and for eight years most chapters were bad. The algorithm made hundreds of small decisions, every one of them by rule, and none of them required knowing when the turnaround would finally arrive.
The edge is not prediction. The edge is never needing to be right about the timing.
Backtested results. Past performance does not guarantee future results. For educational purposes only.
The real lesson
Intel is the vehicle. The lesson travels.
01
A sideways market is not dead money if you have rules
Four years of Intel going nowhere paid +95.9% to an account that bought weakness and sold strength by rule, and built a 4,056 share position for the run that came later.
02
The cool off you fear is a scenario the rules have already rehearsed
If this year's winners give it back, the round trip shows the plan: buy the collapse in steps, bank the bounces, and hold the recovery on a wide threshold so the next run starts from a low basis.
03
Banked profit is the only profit that survives the next chapter
Realized cash, $100,289 in the range, $118,627 in the run, $108,169 in the round trip, does not care what Intel does next. The question is not whether the algorithm works. The question is which job you want it doing in your account.
Backtested results. Past performance does not guarantee future results. For educational purposes only.
A path forward
Your capital never leaves your account. The algorithm trades under rules you set, in a brokerage account you own, with zero custody handed to anyone. You keep full control and full transparency. What changes is the decision making: rules, not reactions.
Eight years of Intel asked investors to wait, then wait longer, then buy at the top. The algorithm never waited for anything. It harvested four flat years for +95.9%, turned a round trip to nowhere into +159.1% and a $35.96 basis, and rode the year of the run to +117.9% with the profit banked before the slide. The buy and holder needed the turnaround to arrive on schedule. The algorithm got paid while everyone else was still waiting.
Every stock has a waiting period. What is your plan for getting paid during it?
Book a demo Or talk with the Concierge team
Buy and hold, the round trip
-0.6%
The Market Wave Algorithm for Equities, the round trip
+159.1%
$108,169 banked as realized profit
More case studies
META
Volatility Harvesting for Meta
Strategy return +217.8% in “The AI race accumulator”
Read the case study PLTR
Volatility Harvesting for Palantir
Strategy return +312% in “The gap buyer, finer wave”
Read the case study MU
MU: a trillion-dollar run, a 41% drop in five weeks, and three recipes that paid in cash
Strategy return +461.7% in “The 2026 scoreboard”
Read the case study
See every case study
Important disclosures
Backtested and hypothetical performance results have inherent limitations and do not represent actual trading. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Nothing in this presentation is investment advice. It is provided for educational purposes only. Algorithm performance varies with settings and market conditions. Consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decision.
© 2026 Arch Public. All rights reserved. Published August 21, 2026.
Terms and conditions
Privacy policy
Cookies and trackers
Your privacy choices